SO FAR LEFT, WE ARE RIGHT

Subscribe



Women: In Front and Behind Enemy Lines

January 25th, 2013 in Guests by

In a landmark move that propels women’s equality another step forward, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta announced yesterday that by January 2016, the ban on women in combat will be lifted.  This is big news.  A major step.  Yet, in actual combat missions, little changes: women have been in active combat in both Afghanistan and in Iraq. According to The Daily Beast, the distinction was in the name: “attached” to a combat unit, instead of being “assigned.” The real significance lies in the “tens of thousands of additional jobs, allowing women to compete for higher positions and promotions previously denied them.” So chicks in the military are square now, right?  Well, the Internet is abuzz with references to the combat military women have already been experiencing for years: sexual violence.  If it comes from your own battalion, do we call it “friendly rape?” Surely Todd Akin could help us out with the appropriate terminology.

This historic announcement comes on the heels of a hearing by the House Armed Services Committee on sexual assault.  As a secret that has become more difficult to keep under wraps, the truth about sexual violence against women within the military is reaching the forefront of American consciousness, thanks to more women speaking out against their attackers and those in the media who have listened.  The Academy-Award nominated documentary “The Invisible War” depicts this ugly reality.  By interviewing female soldiers who have undergone the physical sexual assault by members of their units, their trauma compounded by threats by the powers that be to fail to acknowledge and prosecute the assailants, “The Invisible War” shines a light on the layers of suffering some women in the military face.  Imagine this: a female military officer is violently raped by her immediate supervisor.  The regulated course of action for her?  The chain of command insists that she report the rape to her immediate supervisor who has jurisdiction to decide if the case warrants an investigation and prosecution, or not. 

Yeah, the same guy who raped her gets to decide if he should put himself on trial.  In 2011, there were 3192 (According to the Pentagon’s Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Office) reports of MSA (military sexual assault).  The amount that made it to trial: 240.

Why?  Is it the overwhelming culture of violence?  The scarcity of non-violent sexual opportunity?  An influx of violent men into the military?  Is it the hierarchy, the rank and file that automatically pit women as lowly esteemed compared to higher ranking men?  Is sexual assault part of the way female soldiers are broken down? Might it be that in  war, when the task at hand includes the killing of other humans, a disconnect between some people’s humanity and morality becomes so wide that the distinction between right and wrong disappears? Or could it be the code among men, the time-honored system of protection within the military of those who commit heinous crimes? 

I don’t know.  I do know that in an all volunteer military that has seen near constant war since 2001, we have a ways to go to honor the sacrifices made by every single enlisted soldier. I know that by bringing the trauma – that counts among it sexual violence on top of war scenarios that see death and violence in more capacities I can ever know – to light, we might be able to stem an ugly tide.  And that with the opening of every single military position soon to be available to women, there is likely to be greater advocacy for women within the military.  A friend in a leadership role?  Yes, please. Might a military that offers equal opportunity for women promote greater respect for the women within it?  Could this be the beginning of a shift in culture that will render women less underlings and more equals? 

At my most optimistic, I want to believe that equality – even if it’s mostly symbolic -  might breed a lessening of sexual violence.

Then we can get back to the task at hand: more war.

Author: Jaime Franchi

Jaime Franchi is a freelance writer living on Long Island. Her work can be found on Salon.com, Milieu Magazine, Punchnel's and the New York Times. www.JaimeFranchi.com

Enjoy this Post? Share it on your favorite social bookmarking site...

Submit to Mixx Submit to StumbleUpon Submit to Delicious Submit to Digg

6 Comments

Lisa Valentine

January 25th, 2013

Yikes.

Richard Brown

January 25th, 2013

Very eloquent, as well as disturbing. True equality won’t arrive until this problem has been eradicated. (Or maybe it will arrive when neither men nor women need to be assigned to combat roles.)

Phyllis

January 26th, 2013

I just went to the base legal office who sent me to the OSI. There are ways around it, though maybe not easily accessible in some cases. Orders can be not followed if they are illegal. An imho, asking your perp if you can prosecute him would be an illegal order.

John Carley

January 26th, 2013

Great article.. It really is past time to address the sexual objectification of women in this Country. Maybe it’s time the Media starts projecting women as strong and capable role models instead of half naked sex objects? Thanks for pointing that out….

Mathew Paust

January 26th, 2013

You shine a bright, clarifying light on this troubling issue, Jaime. I agree with you, we’ve moved another step forward.

Joan Haskins

May 15th, 2013

Excellent article. Disturbing as hell.

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

Check out some more great tutorials and articles that you might like.

css.php